King Felix a King Yankee?

Here's a possibility that I think the Yankees should aim for: bringing Felix Hernandez to the Bronx. The Seattle Mariners have said that he is not up for trade, but would they really turn down a nice offer? Yes, the Yankees are reportedly in the hunt to trade for Roy Halladay,but in my opinion, it wouldn't hurt to inquire about "King Felix", as he is called.
What many people seem to forget and don't realize is that Hernandez is just 23 years old. That's right, more than a year older than Joba Chamberlain and two months older than Phil Hughes. He entered the majors when he was younger than 20, and has been considered a "veteran" by many. King Felix has produced year after year, and he is already one of the best aces in baseball.
Armed with a high-90s to 100 m.p.h. fastball, amazing two-seamer, sweeping curve, and very good changeup and slider. His repetoire of pitches and great control lead him to defeat even the best of hitters.
But, before we get started on how good he is, let's take a look at what the cost would potentially be: a) either Chamberlain or Hughes; b) either Austin Jackson or Jesus Montero; and c) either two mid-level prospects or one lower-level majors-ready player from a list for the M's to choose. The cost is high, but with all of these players, we do not know how they will turn out; you need to look at how the sum of them will produce versus what Felix will do. So, the cost may not end up being as huge as first glance. The first piece of a blockbuster deal would be a top pitching prospect; to get one of the best, you have to give up a guy with potential to maybe be just as good. That pitcher would be either Chamberlain or Hughes. Chamberlain, at times, has better stuff, and thus far in his career, has proved to be an on-and-off performer, while Hughes is pretty consistent, and is probably the better overall pitcher. If it was, me, Joba would be given up. Then, the acquiring team would have to give up one of their top position prospects, in this case either Jackson or Montero. Jackson is said to be an all-around player who excels at every part of this game, and Montero is a slugging catcher who could eventually become a first baseman or catcher. This decision would be tough, but because of our catching depth in the minors, I would let Montero go. Finally, the Mariners would likely get a list where they would have to pick either two medium prospects or one player ready for the majors, but not too good. Would you give the Mariners this proposal, and is it worth it?
There are also a few reasons why I would want to go after King Felix rather than Halladay. Halladay isn't getting any younger, and is a free agent after next season, likely wanting to test the market. Hernandez, on the other hand, has two more years in which he is arbitration-eligible, and with how young he is, the Yankees could try to lock him up long-term. This would give them a devestating rotation for the present and future.
Do you think King Felix should become a King Yankee?
What many people seem to forget and don't realize is that Hernandez is just 23 years old. That's right, more than a year older than Joba Chamberlain and two months older than Phil Hughes. He entered the majors when he was younger than 20, and has been considered a "veteran" by many. King Felix has produced year after year, and he is already one of the best aces in baseball.
Armed with a high-90s to 100 m.p.h. fastball, amazing two-seamer, sweeping curve, and very good changeup and slider. His repetoire of pitches and great control lead him to defeat even the best of hitters.
But, before we get started on how good he is, let's take a look at what the cost would potentially be: a) either Chamberlain or Hughes; b) either Austin Jackson or Jesus Montero; and c) either two mid-level prospects or one lower-level majors-ready player from a list for the M's to choose. The cost is high, but with all of these players, we do not know how they will turn out; you need to look at how the sum of them will produce versus what Felix will do. So, the cost may not end up being as huge as first glance. The first piece of a blockbuster deal would be a top pitching prospect; to get one of the best, you have to give up a guy with potential to maybe be just as good. That pitcher would be either Chamberlain or Hughes. Chamberlain, at times, has better stuff, and thus far in his career, has proved to be an on-and-off performer, while Hughes is pretty consistent, and is probably the better overall pitcher. If it was, me, Joba would be given up. Then, the acquiring team would have to give up one of their top position prospects, in this case either Jackson or Montero. Jackson is said to be an all-around player who excels at every part of this game, and Montero is a slugging catcher who could eventually become a first baseman or catcher. This decision would be tough, but because of our catching depth in the minors, I would let Montero go. Finally, the Mariners would likely get a list where they would have to pick either two medium prospects or one player ready for the majors, but not too good. Would you give the Mariners this proposal, and is it worth it?
There are also a few reasons why I would want to go after King Felix rather than Halladay. Halladay isn't getting any younger, and is a free agent after next season, likely wanting to test the market. Hernandez, on the other hand, has two more years in which he is arbitration-eligible, and with how young he is, the Yankees could try to lock him up long-term. This would give them a devestating rotation for the present and future.
Do you think King Felix should become a King Yankee?















